Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 10/97-CE dated 01.03.1997 for clearances of Dissolved Acetylene to the Department of Atomic Energy.
Analysis: The appellant produced a certificate before the Tribunal showing that the goods supplied to the Department of Atomic Energy were meant for research purposes. The certificate was signed by the Deputy Director, who was treated as holding a rank equivalent to Deputy Secretary to the Government of India. On verification of the factual matrix and the end-use of the goods, the Tribunal held that the condition in the notification stood satisfied. The objection that the certificate had not been produced before the lower authorities did not alter the conclusion on the merits of entitlement to exemption.
Conclusion: The appellant was held eligible for the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 10/97-CE dated 01.03.1997.