<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 226 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333206</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 10/97-CE was available for Dissolved Acetylene supplied for research purposes to the Department of Atomic Energy. The Tribunal accepted a certificate showing the end use of the goods and treated the signatory as holding a rank equivalent to Deputy Secretary to the Government of India. On verification of the factual matrix and the use of the goods, the notification condition was found satisfied. The objection that the certificate was not produced before the lower authorities did not defeat entitlement to exemption on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 226 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333206</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 10/97-CE was available for Dissolved Acetylene supplied for research purposes to the Department of Atomic Energy. The Tribunal accepted a certificate showing the end use of the goods and treated the signatory as holding a rank equivalent to Deputy Secretary to the Government of India. On verification of the factual matrix and the use of the goods, the notification condition was found satisfied. The objection that the certificate was not produced before the lower authorities did not defeat entitlement to exemption on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>