Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported compressed air breathing apparatus qualified as a complete life-saving breathing apparatus entitled to exemption under the relevant exemption notification.
Analysis: The imported apparatus generated compressed air but was not, by itself, a complete breathing system. The Court noted that the equipment had to be attached to a ventilator before it could function as a life support system for the patient. The description in the exemption entry covered only a complete compressed air breathing apparatus, and the fact that the imported unit could be connected either individually or to a central system did not make it complete in itself. Since the ventilator unit through which air was actually delivered to the patient was not imported, the claim to exemption failed.
Conclusion: The imported goods did not satisfy the requirement of a complete compressed air breathing apparatus and were not entitled to the claimed exemption.