<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 198 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33140</link>
    <description>Imported compressed air breathing apparatus was held not to qualify as a complete life-saving breathing apparatus for exemption purposes because the unit only generated compressed air and was not a complete breathing system by itself. The court noted that it had to be attached to a ventilator before it could function as a life support system, and the ventilator through which air was actually delivered to the patient was not imported. The fact that the equipment could be connected individually or to a central system did not make it complete in itself. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 198 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33140</link>
      <description>Imported compressed air breathing apparatus was held not to qualify as a complete life-saving breathing apparatus for exemption purposes because the unit only generated compressed air and was not a complete breathing system by itself. The court noted that it had to be attached to a ventilator before it could function as a life support system, and the ventilator through which air was actually delivered to the patient was not imported. The fact that the equipment could be connected individually or to a central system did not make it complete in itself. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>