Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was liable to be directed to pre-deposit any amount pending appeal in a dispute concerning classification of services as manpower recruitment or supply service, and whether the Department had quantified any amount attributable to manpower service.
Analysis: The appellant's contracts indicated not merely manpower supply but also operation and maintenance of ONGC-owned workover rigs. The Department supported the impugned order but could not quantify the portion, if any, relatable to manpower service. In the absence of such quantification, no pre-deposit could be ordered pending disposal of the appeal.
Outcome: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived during pendency of the appeal, with liberty to seek early hearing.