https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32963 The dispute concerned classification of services as manpower recruitment or supply service and whether any amount attributable to manpower service had been quantified for pre-deposit purposes. The appellant's contracts showed that the work involved not only manpower supply but also operation and maintenance of ONGC-owned workover rigs. As the Department could not quantify any portion relatable to manpower service, no pre-deposit was justified pending disposal of the appeal. The pre-deposit requirement was therefore waived during the pendency of the appeal, with liberty to seek early hearing. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32963 The dispute concerned classification of services as manpower recruitment or supply service and whether any amount attributable to manpower service had been quantified for pre-deposit purposes. The appellant's contracts showed that the work involved not only manpower supply but also operation and maintenance of ONGC-owned workover rigs. As the Department could not quantify any portion relatable to manpower service, no pre-deposit was justified pending disposal of the appeal. The pre-deposit requirement was therefore waived during the pendency of the appeal, with liberty to seek early hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32963