Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with offences under the Customs Act and allied allegations.
Analysis: The applicant had been in custody for a substantial period, the investigation was substantially complete, and the complaint had already been filed. The Court applied the settled bail principles of the nature of accusation, severity of punishment, supporting evidence, apprehension of tampering with witnesses, and delay in trial. On the facts, there was no sufficient ground to refuse bail merely because of the allegations of prior similar activity, particularly when the material investigation was over and the Court found a prima facie case for exercise of discretion in favour of release.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to regular bail and was ordered to be released on conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Regular bail may be granted where the investigation is substantially complete, custody has become prolonged, and the settled factors governing bail weigh in favour of release despite serious allegations.