Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (3) TMI 235 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeals, agreement deemed not genuine, specific conditions met The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue's appeals, affirming that the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was inapplicable, and ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeals, agreement deemed not genuine, specific conditions met

                              The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue's appeals, affirming that the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was inapplicable, and conditions under Section 47(xiii) were met. Consequently, additions of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains and Rs. 21 lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 as income from undisclosed sources were deleted.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Validity of the agreement dated December 7, 1998.
                              2. Applicability of Section 45(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                              3. Fulfillment of conditions under Section 47(xiii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                              4. Addition of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains.
                              5. Deletion of additions of Rs. 21 lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 on account of income from undisclosed sources.

                              Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Validity of the Agreement Dated December 7, 1998:
                              The primary contention was whether the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was genuine. The assessee argued that the agreement was fabricated and not signed by the partners. The Assessing Officer relied on this agreement to assess capital gains but did not verify the signatures through a handwriting expert. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) found that the agreement was not shown in its original form to the assessee and concluded that it was not a valid or genuine document. The CIT(A) noted discrepancies in the statements of witnesses and the lack of corroborative evidence from Shri Vijay Sood, who claimed the agreement's authenticity.

                              2. Applicability of Section 45(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                              The Assessing Officer invoked Section 45(4), which deals with capital gains arising from the transfer of capital assets by way of distribution on the dissolution of a firm. However, the CIT(A) held that since the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was not applicable. The CIT(A) emphasized that the transfer of business to M/s. Oriental Knit Fab. Pvt. Ltd. was governed by agreements dated April 1, 1999, and December 30, 1999, which were genuine and registered documents.

                              3. Fulfillment of Conditions Under Section 47(xiii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                              Section 47(xiii) exempts certain transfers from being considered as capital gains if specific conditions are met. The CIT(A) found that all conditions under Section 47(xiii) were satisfied:
                              - All assets and liabilities of the firm became those of the company.
                              - All partners became shareholders in the same proportion as their capital accounts.
                              - No consideration was received by the partners other than by way of allotment of shares.
                              - The aggregate shareholding of the partners was not less than 50% of the total voting power and continued for more than five years.

                              4. Addition of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as Capital Gains:
                              The Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains based on the alleged agreement dated December 7, 1998. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, concluding that the agreement was not genuine and that the conditions for exemption under Section 47(xiii) were met. The Tribunal upheld this finding, noting that the business transfer was validly executed through registered agreements dated April 1, 1999, and December 30, 1999.

                              5. Deletion of Additions of Rs. 21 Lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 on Account of Income from Undisclosed Sources:
                              The Assessing Officer made these additions based on the alleged payments mentioned in the disputed agreement dated December 7, 1998. The CIT(A), following the reasoning in the main appeal, deleted these additions. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision that the agreement was not genuine and no such payments were made.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal dismissed all the Revenue's appeals, affirming the CIT(A)'s findings that the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was not applicable, and the conditions under Section 47(xiii) were fulfilled. Consequently, the additions of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains and Rs. 21 lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 as income from undisclosed sources were deleted.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found