<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 235 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was inapplicable, and conditions under Section 47(xiii) were met. Consequently, additions of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains and Rs. 21 lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 as income from undisclosed sources were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=419454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 235 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the agreement dated December 7, 1998, was not genuine, Section 45(4) was inapplicable, and conditions under Section 47(xiii) were met. Consequently, additions of Rs. 1,58,63,380 as capital gains and Rs. 21 lakhs and Rs. 23,50,000 as income from undisclosed sources were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>