Supreme Court dismisses petition, opts not to intervene in judgment; petitioner's legal representation noted, respondent unrepresented. The SC, with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh presiding, dismissed the special leave petition. The petitioner had legal representation, while ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses petition, opts not to intervene in judgment; petitioner's legal representation noted, respondent unrepresented.
The SC, with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh presiding, dismissed the special leave petition. The petitioner had legal representation, while the respondent did not. The Court chose not to intervene in the impugned judgment, resulting in the dismissal of the petition and disposal of any pending applications.
Issues involved: Dismissal of special leave petition
The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh, heard the matter. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Arunabh Choudhary, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv., Ms. Adya Shree Dutta, Adv., and Mr. Jayant Mohan, AOR. However, there was no representation for the respondent. The Court, after hearing the counsel, decided not to interfere with the impugned judgment. Consequently, the special leave petition was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.