https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314469 The SC, with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh presiding, dismissed the special leave petition. The petitioner had legal representation, while the respondent did not. The Court chose not to intervene in the impugned judgment, resulting in the dismissal of the petition and disposal of any pending applications. en-us Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314469 The SC, with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh presiding, dismissed the special leave petition. The petitioner had legal representation, while the respondent did not. The Court chose not to intervene in the impugned judgment, resulting in the dismissal of the petition and disposal of any pending applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314469