False disclosures in nomination papers justified denial of anticipatory bail in a municipal election dispute

Anticipatory bail was refused where petitioners were accused of making false disclosures in municipal election nomination papers, giving rise to proceedings for violation of the Bihar Nagar Palika Act, 2007 and an FIR under penal provisions. The Court found no justification for pre-arrest protection on the facts presented and rejected the contention that custodial interrogation was unnecessary.

---

---

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners.

Analysis: The petitioners were accused of having made false disclosures in nomination papers for municipal elections, leading to findings of violation under the Bihar Nagar Palika Act, 2007 and the lodging of an FIR under the relevant penal provisions. The Court found no justification to grant pre-arrest protection in the facts of the case, and declined to accept the plea that custodial interrogation was unnecessary.

Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was refused.

---