TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi HC Rectifies Order, Confirms Petitioner's Role as Resolution Professional; Bars Coercive Actions Until Next Hearing.</h1> <h3>Dr. Arun Mohan Versus Central Bureau Of Investigation</h3> The HC of Delhi corrected an error in its order, confirming the petitioner's position as a Resolution Professional designated by the Committee of ... Rectification of mistake - error apparent from the face of record - petitioner was appointed as a Resolution Professional by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and not an Interim Resolution Professional - HELD THAT:- The order is rectified - application disposed off. The High Court of Delhi rectified an error in an order, clarifying the petitioner's role as a Resolution Professional appointed by the Committee of Creditors. The court also directed that no coercive steps be taken until the next hearing. The application was disposed of, and the order was to be given dasti under the Court Master's signatures.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
