TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Dismisses Appeal; NCLAT Decision Stands, Appellant's Arguments Deferred for Future Consideration by Appropriate Bench.</h1> <h3>Union Bank of India Versus Financial Creditors of M/s. Amtek Auto Limited & Ors.</h3> The SC dismissed the Civil Appeal, upholding the decision of the NCLAT. The appellant's arguments are deferred for consideration by the appropriate Bench ... Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call its order - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - power to entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds - It was held by Principal Bench that This Tribunal is not vested with any power to review the judgment, however, in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction this Tribunal can entertain an application for recall of judgment on sufficient grounds - HELD THAT:- The view taken by the Five Judges Bench of the NCLAT not agreed upon and thus there are no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. Insofar as the endeavour of learned counsel for the appellant to urge on the facts of the case is concerned, that would be a matter to be considered, dependent on the fate when the matter is placed before the appropriate Bench, to be decided on merits. Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeal, agreeing with the view taken by the NCLAT. The appellant's arguments will be considered by the appropriate Bench in the future.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
