<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1365 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312368</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the view taken by the Five Judges Bench of the NCLAT and dismissed the civil appeal. It recorded agreement with that bench&#039;s approach and left the appellant&#039;s factual and merits-based contentions to be considered by the appropriate bench. The order therefore confirms non-interference at this stage and preserves those issues for determination in the proper forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1365 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312368</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the view taken by the Five Judges Bench of the NCLAT and dismissed the civil appeal. It recorded agreement with that bench&#039;s approach and left the appellant&#039;s factual and merits-based contentions to be considered by the appropriate bench. The order therefore confirms non-interference at this stage and preserves those issues for determination in the proper forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>