Payments to USFDA for Testing Services Not Taxable; Tribunal Rules in Favor of Appellant, Overturning Revenue Demands.

The Tribunal set aside the demands, interest, and penalties imposed by the Revenue authorities on the appellant for payments made to USFDA under Technical Testing and Certification Services. It held that such payments were not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism, aligning with a previous decision involving the same appellant. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Taxability of payments made to USFDA under Technical Testing and Certification Services.
2. Applicability of reverse charge mechanism on payments made to USFDA.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Taxability of payments made to USFDA under Technical Testing and Certification Services
The case involved appeals against an Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II confirming demands, interest, and penalties on the appellant for receiving Technical Inspection and Certification Services from USFDA. The appellant had sent samples for inspection and analysis to USFDA for certifying product quality for export to the USA. The Revenue authorities contended that payments made by the appellant to USFDA were taxable under Technical Testing and Certification Services under the reverse charge mechanism.

Issue 2: Applicability of reverse charge mechanism on payments made to USFDA
The Tribunal referred to a previous case involving the same appellant for the period 18.4.2006 to 31.3.2008, where it was held that payments to USFDA are not covered under the reverse charge mechanism as they constitute fees payable to USFDA. Citing the previous order dated 11.2.2016, the Tribunal found that the payments made by the appellant to USFDA were not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demands raised by the Revenue authorities and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant.

In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the payments made to USFDA by the appellant for Technical Inspection and Certification Services were not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism. Therefore, the impugned orders confirming demands, interest, and penalties were deemed unsustainable and were set aside. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, following the precedent established in a previous case involving the same issue.

---