<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1391 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands, interest, and penalties imposed by the Revenue authorities on the appellant for payments made to USFDA under Technical Testing and Certification Services. It held that such payments were not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism, aligning with a previous decision involving the same appellant. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1391 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands, interest, and penalties imposed by the Revenue authorities on the appellant for payments made to USFDA under Technical Testing and Certification Services. It held that such payments were not taxable under the reverse charge mechanism, aligning with a previous decision involving the same appellant. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>