Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the filing of a piece-meal charge sheet before completion of investigation into all offences in the FIR defeated the petitioner's right to default bail under section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The Court held that the statutory scheme requires completion of the entire investigation in respect of all offences in the case before a final report under section 173 can be treated as complete for the purpose of section 167(2). It distinguished further investigation under section 173(8) from incomplete investigation and held that further investigation can follow only after a complete charge sheet has been filed. The charge sheet filed within time covered only part of the allegations and left substantial issues in the FIR pending, so it was treated as a piecemeal charge sheet. The Court further held that such a filing cannot be used to circumvent the indefeasible right to default bail, which is linked to personal liberty under Article 21.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to statutory bail under section 167(2), and the request for default bail was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: An incomplete or piecemeal charge sheet that does not conclude investigation into all offences in the FIR cannot defeat the accused's indefeasible right to default bail under section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.