Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of deemed suspension could be sustained when no departmental proceedings had been initiated and no charge-sheet had been filed in the criminal case for a prolonged period.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the Tribunal's order quashing the suspension of a government medical officer. The record showed that although the employee had been placed under deemed suspension after arrest, neither departmental proceedings had been commenced nor a charge-sheet filed in the criminal court. The Court applied the principle that suspension cannot be continued indefinitely and relied on the rule that, if no memorandum of charges or charge-sheet is served within the permissible period, continuation of suspension is not justified, though the administration may transfer the employee or impose other safeguards.
Conclusion: The suspension could not be continued in the absence of departmental proceedings or a criminal charge-sheet, and the Tribunal's order quashing the suspension was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was rejected and the suspension order remained quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Prolonged suspension is not sustainable where no charge-sheet or departmental charges are served within the permissible period, and the administration must either proceed with reasons for extension or adopt alternative measures short of continuing suspension.