Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bail should be granted in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 where the Court found that the recovery and surrounding material attracted the statutory bar under section 37.
Analysis: The petitioner sought bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with offences under sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The Court noted the recovery of 200 grams of heroin from the petitioner, but also considered the larger overall recovery of 36.240 kilograms from all accused persons. The Court relied on call detail records and other surrounding material showing connectivity with the alleged drug cartel and held that the restrictions under section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 were attracted.
Conclusion: Bail was declined.