<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1390 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305145</link>
    <description>Bail in an NDPS prosecution was declined because the recovery and surrounding material attracted the statutory bar under section 37. The Court noted recovery of heroin from the accused, the larger collective recovery from the group, and call detail records indicating connectivity with the alleged drug cartel. On that basis, the twin restrictions under section 37 were treated as applicable, and bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:28:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1390 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305145</link>
      <description>Bail in an NDPS prosecution was declined because the recovery and surrounding material attracted the statutory bar under section 37. The Court noted recovery of heroin from the accused, the larger collective recovery from the group, and call detail records indicating connectivity with the alleged drug cartel. On that basis, the twin restrictions under section 37 were treated as applicable, and bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>