Ink-age analysis on disputed cheques refused where scientific certainty is lacking and existing evidence is sufficient.

Forensic examination to determine the age of ink on disputed cheques was held unnecessary where scientific accuracy is lacking and the issue can be decided on the existing evidence. The plea that the cheques were blank instruments later filled up and misused was treated as a matter for appreciation of evidence, not as a basis for directing expert analysis at the appellate stage. Authorities cited for ink-age testing were distinguished as not supporting such a reference in a civil revision of this nature. The request for expert opinion on ink age was therefore rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed cheques should be sent for forensic examination to determine the age of the ink used for filling in the particulars and signatures, at the appellate stage.

Analysis: The request was sought to support the defendants' plea that the cheques had been filled up later, but the Court noted that the age of ink cannot be determined with scientific accuracy. The plea that the cheques were blank instruments kept in a partnership concern and later misused was a matter for appreciation of evidence by the appellate court and did not justify a forensic reference. The Court also distinguished authorities relied upon by the petitioners and held that they did not advance the request for ink-age analysis in a civil revision of this nature.

Conclusion: The request to send the cheques for expert opinion on ink age was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: Where expert determination of ink age lacks scientific certainty and the issue can be decided on the existing evidence, a court need not direct forensic examination of the disputed cheque.

---