https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305057 The High Court dismissed the Revision, concurring with the lower Court that forensic examination of the disputed cheques would not yield scientifically accurate results. The Court found the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for forensic examination unnecessary, upholding the lower Court's decision. The dispute regarding the age of ink used in the cheques and the right to fair trial were considered, with the Court emphasizing the limitations of determining ink age scientifically. en-us Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:32:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305057 The High Court dismissed the Revision, concurring with the lower Court that forensic examination of the disputed cheques would not yield scientifically accurate results. The Court found the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for forensic examination unnecessary, upholding the lower Court's decision. The dispute regarding the age of ink used in the cheques and the right to fair trial were considered, with the Court emphasizing the limitations of determining ink age scientifically. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305057