Order modification by consent: wording on land identification and selection was substituted in the earlier judgment.

The parties agreed that paragraphs 33(ii) and 33(iii) of the earlier order needed modification so the wording would state that the land was identified and proposed by the respondent APSEZL and finally selected by CWC, subject to the time-frame prescribed in the judgment. The application was disposed of on that basis, with the specified substitution directed in the earlier order.

---

---

Issues: Whether paragraph 33(ii) and (iii) of the order dated 30.06.2021 required modification by substituting the specified words in place of the existing phrase.

Analysis: The parties agreed that the wording in paragraph 33(ii) and (iii) should be altered to reflect that the land was identified and proposed by the respondent APSEZL and finally selected by CWC, subject to the time-frame prescribed in the judgment.

Conclusion: The application for modification was disposed of with the stated substitution in the earlier order.

---