Court orders CWC to comply with SEZ regulations within specified timeline, offers interim relief

The court directed CWC to comply with SEZ regulations within three months or relocate to a new facility provided by APSEZL within a year. The interim relief allowing CWC to continue its activities within the SEZ was extended for this period. The court emphasized the need for compliance with SEZ Act and Rules, while also facilitating a practical solution for both parties through alternative arrangements.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the communication dated 5.1.2017 by APSEZL to CWC.
2. Compliance with SEZ Act and Rules by CWC.
3. Proposals for alternative arrangements by APSEZL.
4. Interim relief and settlement efforts.
5. Legal implications of SEZ Act overriding other agreements.
6. Continuation of warehousing activities by CWC within SEZ.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Communication Dated 5.1.2017 by APSEZL to CWC:
The impugned communication from APSEZL to CWC dated 5.1.2017 stated that CWC must obtain a Letter of Approval (LOA) from the Development Commissioner as a SEZ Unit or obtain specific permission to continue warehousing activities. This was based on the SEZ Act and Rules, particularly Rule 11(5) and 11(7), which prohibit leasing land in SEZ to entities without a valid LOA. CWC challenged this communication, arguing that their lease agreement dated 2.6.2004 should allow them to continue their activities without further approvals.

2. Compliance with SEZ Act and Rules by CWC:
The court emphasized that SEZ Act, 2005 is a special law with overriding provisions as per Section 51, which mandates compliance for any entity operating within SEZ. Despite CWC's lease predating the SEZ notification, the court noted that CWC must either obtain the necessary approvals or seek a waiver from the Development Commissioner to continue its operations legally.

3. Proposals for Alternative Arrangements by APSEZL:
APSEZL offered to relocate CWC's warehousing facility to an equivalent plot outside the SEZ area and construct a new warehouse at their own cost. This proposal was made to facilitate APSEZL's compliance with SEZ regulations. The court found this offer to be generous and in good faith. However, CWC's insistence on additional conditions, including underwriting future business losses based on their published tariffs, was deemed unreasonable and beyond the scope of the initial proposal.

4. Interim Relief and Settlement Efforts:
The court noted that interim relief was granted to CWC by a Coordinate Bench on 11.1.2017, allowing them to continue their warehousing activities within the SEZ. Despite several adjournments to facilitate an out-of-court settlement, the parties could not reach an agreement, particularly on the third proposal concerning future business losses.

5. Legal Implications of SEZ Act Overriding Other Agreements:
The court highlighted that the SEZ Act, 2005, with its overriding provisions, supersedes any prior agreements, including the lease agreement between CWC and APSEZL. This means that CWC's operations must comply with SEZ regulations, irrespective of their prior lease terms.

6. Continuation of Warehousing Activities by CWC within SEZ:
The court provided a timeline for CWC to either obtain necessary approvals or relocate to a new facility constructed by APSEZL outside the SEZ area. The interim order allowing CWC to continue its activities within the SEZ was extended for this period. The court also left the issue of underwriting future business losses open for further negotiation or mediation.

Conclusion:
The court directed CWC to comply with SEZ regulations within three months or relocate to a new facility provided by APSEZL within a year. The interim relief allowing CWC to continue its activities within the SEZ was extended for this period. The court emphasized the need for compliance with SEZ Act and Rules, while also facilitating a practical solution for both parties through alternative arrangements.

---