Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to consideration of its representation seeking exemption from Urban Land Tax under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act, and whether interim protection was warranted till such consideration.
Analysis: The representation dated 09.02.2005 was found to have been received by the office of the first respondent, notwithstanding the respondents' inability to trace it in the file. In these circumstances, the representation was required to be considered on merits and in accordance with law. To preserve the subject matter pending such consideration, maintenance of status quo in respect of the impugned demand was directed.
Conclusion: The representation seeking exemption was directed to be furnished again and decided by the first respondent on merits, with status quo maintained until then.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by directing reconsideration of the exemption claim and granting interim protection against coercive enforcement of the demand.