<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304383</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a Temple, to provide another copy of the representation seeking exemption from Urban Land Tax under Section 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act. The first respondent was ordered to make a decision within four weeks after receiving the documents, maintaining the status quo on the tax demand until then. The Court emphasized prompt consideration of the representation and closed the case without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=691496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304383</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a Temple, to provide another copy of the representation seeking exemption from Urban Land Tax under Section 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act. The first respondent was ordered to make a decision within four weeks after receiving the documents, maintaining the status quo on the tax demand until then. The Court emphasized prompt consideration of the representation and closed the case without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>