Supreme Court Halts Prosecution Initiation; Parties Represented Unequally The Supreme Court granted a stay on the initiation of prosecution in the case, as per the order in 2015 (12) TMI 1875 - SC. The petitioner was represented ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Supreme Court granted a stay on the initiation of prosecution in the case, as per the order in 2015 (12) TMI 1875 - SC. The petitioner was represented by counsel, while the respondent did not have representation. The court issued notice and rejected the prayer for other interim reliefs.
The Supreme Court of India issued an order in 2015 (12) TMI 1875 - SC, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant presiding. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Venkatraman Sr. Adv., Mr. Biju P. Raman, Adv., Mr. Amit Mathur, Adv., Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv., and Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, AOR. The respondent did not have representation. The court issued notice and granted a stay on the initiation of prosecution, while rejecting the prayer for other interim reliefs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.