Service agreement breach in internet provision led to dismissal, allowing respondents to appoint another agency for continuity.

The Tribunal recorded a prima facie breach of the service agreement where the internet service provider allegedly failed to supply contracted internet services to residents, and it noted the urgency created by the service disruption. On that basis, the application was dismissed, and the respondents were left free to engage another agency to provide the necessary services.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application filed by the internet service provider deserved to be dismissed and whether the respondents could be permitted to obtain services through another agency.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted the alleged failure to provide internet services to the residents and recorded a prima facie view that the applicant had breached the agreement by not supplying the contracted services. It also took note of the urgency caused by disruption of internet services.

Conclusion: The application was dismissed and the respondents were left at liberty to engage another agency for providing the necessary services.

---