<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1327 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recorded a prima facie breach of the service agreement where the internet service provider allegedly failed to supply contracted internet services to residents, and it noted the urgency created by the service disruption. On that basis, the application was dismissed, and the respondents were left free to engage another agency to provide the necessary services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1327 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recorded a prima facie breach of the service agreement where the internet service provider allegedly failed to supply contracted internet services to residents, and it noted the urgency created by the service disruption. On that basis, the application was dismissed, and the respondents were left free to engage another agency to provide the necessary services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>