Court orders liquidation of Corporate Debtor after failed resolution plan. Resolution Professional appointed as Liquidator.

The court approved the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor due to the non-receipt of any resolution plan despite extensions granted during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Resolution Professional was appointed as the Liquidator, with detailed directions provided for the liquidation process, including stakeholder claims submission and compliance with regulations. Operational Creditors were affirmed to retain rights to enforce personal guarantees. The judgment elucidated legal provisions governing liquidation under Sections 33 and 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ensuring adherence to prescribed procedures.

---

---

Issues:
1. Liquidation application filed by Resolution Professional.
2. Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional.
3. Extension of CIRP period and submission of resolution plan.
4. Decision for liquidation due to non-receipt of resolution plan.
5. Appointment of Resolution Professional as Liquidator.
6. Directions for liquidation process and stakeholders' claims submission.
7. Publication of public announcement and filing of reports by Liquidator.
8. Operational Creditors' rights and enforcement of personal guarantees.

Analysis:
1. The judgment pertains to a liquidation application filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) of a Corporate Debtor. The RP sought liquidation as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code).

2. Initially, an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). However, the Committee of Creditors (COC) resolved to replace the IRP with a new Resolution Professional, who was subsequently appointed.

3. The CIRP period was extended, and the deadline for submission of resolution plans was also extended. Despite the extensions, no resolution plan was received by the specified date, leading to discussions within the COC regarding the only alternative of liquidation.

4. Following the non-receipt of any resolution plan, the COC approved the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor during a meeting, with the Resolution Professional consenting to act as the Liquidator.

5. The judgment highlights the legal provisions under Sections 33 and 34 of the Code, which govern the process of liquidation and the appointment of the RP as the Liquidator in such cases.

6. Detailed directions were provided for the liquidation process, including the cessation of powers of the Corporate Debtor's management, cooperation requirements from personnel, and the submission of stakeholders' claims within a specified timeframe.

7. The Liquidator was instructed to publish public announcements, file necessary reports within designated timelines, and ensure compliance with the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016.

8. It was clarified that Operational Creditors retain the right to enforce personal guarantees and take appropriate steps in that regard, ensuring their rights are preserved during the liquidation process.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment covers the key issues addressed by the Tribunal in the context of the liquidation application and subsequent processes as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

---