Unrebutted documentary evidence supported a money decree with interest after the defendants failed to file any defence.

Unrebutted documentary evidence and the defendants' failure to appear or file a defence led to the suit being decreed for recovery of the claimed amount. The plaintiff produced the original compilation of documents, which was taken on record, and the Court treated the claim as proved on the material before it. A money decree was passed for the stated amount with further interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit until payment or realisation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the plaintiff was entitled to a decree for recovery of the claimed amount with interest.

Analysis: The defendants were duly served but did not appear and filed no defence. The plaintiff produced the original compilation of documents, which was taken on record. On the basis of the unrebutted claim and the materials placed before the Court, the suit was fit to be decreed.

Conclusion: The claim was decreed and a money decree was passed for the stated amount with further interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till payment or realisation.

---