<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 718 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299693</link>
    <description>Unrebutted documentary evidence and the defendants&#039; failure to appear or file a defence led to the suit being decreed for recovery of the claimed amount. The plaintiff produced the original compilation of documents, which was taken on record, and the Court treated the claim as proved on the material before it. A money decree was passed for the stated amount with further interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit until payment or realisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 10:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=665183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 718 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299693</link>
      <description>Unrebutted documentary evidence and the defendants&#039; failure to appear or file a defence led to the suit being decreed for recovery of the claimed amount. The plaintiff produced the original compilation of documents, which was taken on record, and the Court treated the claim as proved on the material before it. A money decree was passed for the stated amount with further interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit until payment or realisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>