Discretion to refuse additional documents upheld where authenticity was doubtful and signatures mismatched in a pending suit.

The trial court's refusal to receive additional documents in the pending suit was upheld because the application was found not to be genuine and there was a mismatch in signatures. The court also relied on the earlier statement before the Commissioner that the first defendant was unable to depose and that her husband would proceed with the case. In these circumstances, no ground was made out to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion in revision, and the revision petition was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order refusing to receive additional documents in the pending suit called for interference in revision.

Analysis: The petition for receiving documents was rejected by the trial Court on the ground that the application was not shown to be genuine and there was a mismatch in the signatures. The Court also noted the earlier statement before the Commissioner that the first defendant was not in a position to depose and that her husband would proceed with the case. In these circumstances, the Court found no reason to interfere with the trial Court's discretion in declining to receive the documents.

Conclusion: The refusal to receive the additional documents was upheld and the revision petition was dismissed.

---