https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476 The trial court's refusal to receive additional documents in the pending suit was upheld because the application was found not to be genuine and there was a mismatch in signatures. The court also relied on the earlier statement before the Commissioner that the first defendant was unable to depose and that her husband would proceed with the case. In these circumstances, no ground was made out to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion in revision, and the revision petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:17:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476 The trial court's refusal to receive additional documents in the pending suit was upheld because the application was found not to be genuine and there was a mismatch in signatures. The court also relied on the earlier statement before the Commissioner that the first defendant was unable to depose and that her husband would proceed with the case. In these circumstances, no ground was made out to interfere with the trial court's exercise of discretion in revision, and the revision petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476