<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476</link>
    <description>The civil revision petition was dismissed by the trial Court after considering the arguments and evidence, including discrepancies in signatures and the Court Commissioner&#039;s report indicating the first defendant&#039;s inability to provide evidence. The petitioner&#039;s submission of additional documents was contested by the plaintiff, who argued against their genuineness and relevance to the case. Despite the petitioner&#039;s willingness to mark certain documents for examination, objections raised by the respondent regarding signature variations supported the trial Court&#039;s decision. The dismissal of the civil revision petition was upheld, affirming the trial Court&#039;s ruling on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476</link>
      <description>The civil revision petition was dismissed by the trial Court after considering the arguments and evidence, including discrepancies in signatures and the Court Commissioner&#039;s report indicating the first defendant&#039;s inability to provide evidence. The petitioner&#039;s submission of additional documents was contested by the plaintiff, who argued against their genuineness and relevance to the case. Despite the petitioner&#039;s willingness to mark certain documents for examination, objections raised by the respondent regarding signature variations supported the trial Court&#039;s decision. The dismissal of the civil revision petition was upheld, affirming the trial Court&#039;s ruling on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>