Order to Deposit Funds and Appoint Official Liquidator | Compliance Deadline and Winding Up Petition

The court ordered the respondent company to deposit a specified amount within six weeks and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator. The petitioner was directed to pay publication charges, and the Liquidator was tasked with taking immediate charge of the company's assets. Failure to comply would result in the petition being admitted for winding up, with provisional liquidation and publication requirements.

---

---

Issues:
Petition seeking winding up of respondent company under Section 433(e), 434, and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to non-payment of a sum of Rs. 21,76,37,260 arising from an agreement for surrender of rights to purchase two flats.

Analysis:

1. Agreement Details:
The petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondent company for surrendering rights to purchase two flats in exchange for a payment of Rs. 18 crores. The agreement specified payment through post-dated cheques and included an interest clause. The petitioner claims that the first two cheques were dishonored, leading to negotiations and assurances from the respondent regarding payment.

2. Correspondence and Statutory Notice:
Despite repeated reminders and a statutory notice, the respondent failed to respond or make the payment. The respondent sought time citing other legal proceedings, but later decided not to file a reply to the petition, arguing that the agreement lacked consideration and the existence of the sale agreement was disputed.

3. Legal Arguments:
The respondent's counsel contended that no consideration flowed from the petitioner and that the sale agreement was questionable due to ongoing litigation. However, the petitioner argued that the option under the agreement was exercised through correspondence demanding payment, which went unanswered by the respondent.

4. Court's Decision:
The court analyzed the agreement, correspondence, and arguments presented. It noted the issuance of cheques by the respondent, which implied consideration under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found discrepancies in cheque deposit timelines and dishonor reasons. As a result, the court ordered the respondent to deposit a specific amount within a set period. Failure to comply would lead to the petition being admitted for winding up, with provisional liquidation and publication requirements.

5. Order by the Court:
The court directed the respondent to deposit a specified amount within six weeks and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator of the respondent company. The petitioner was instructed to pay publication charges, and the Liquidator was tasked with taking charge of the company's assets immediately. The court's order was to be forwarded to the respondent's registered address promptly.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal aspects, arguments, and the court's decision regarding the petition seeking winding up of the respondent company.

---