<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1325 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293789</link>
    <description>The court ordered the respondent company to deposit a specified amount within six weeks and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator. The petitioner was directed to pay publication charges, and the Liquidator was tasked with taking immediate charge of the company&#039;s assets. Failure to comply would result in the petition being admitted for winding up, with provisional liquidation and publication requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=637824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1325 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293789</link>
      <description>The court ordered the respondent company to deposit a specified amount within six weeks and appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator. The petitioner was directed to pay publication charges, and the Liquidator was tasked with taking immediate charge of the company&#039;s assets. Failure to comply would result in the petition being admitted for winding up, with provisional liquidation and publication requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>