Strict three-month filing limit barred reconsideration, while the challenge to counsel's fees also failed.

The filing rule was interpreted as requiring a bill of costs to be lodged within three months from the date of signing of the decree or order, with no alternative construction accepted. On that reading, the objection based on extension of time failed. The challenge to counsel's fees was also rejected because there was no basis to depart from the earlier view on that issue. The reconsideration application was dismissed with costs against the applicant.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application for reconsideration was liable to be dismissed on the grounds that the bill of costs was time-barred under the applicable limitation rule and that the claim for counsel's fees was unsupported.

Analysis: The rule governing filing time was held to specify a clear period of three months from the date of signing of the decree or order, leaving no room for a different construction. The objection based on extension of time did not survive in view of that interpretation. The challenge to counsel's fees was also rejected, as no reason was found to differ from the earlier view on that point.

Conclusion: The application was dismissed with costs against the applicant.

---