https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292810 The filing rule was interpreted as requiring a bill of costs to be lodged within three months from the date of signing of the decree or order, with no alternative construction accepted. On that reading, the objection based on extension of time failed. The challenge to counsel's fees was also rejected because there was no basis to depart from the earlier view on that issue. The reconsideration application was dismissed with costs against the applicant. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292810 The filing rule was interpreted as requiring a bill of costs to be lodged within three months from the date of signing of the decree or order, with no alternative construction accepted. On that reading, the objection based on extension of time failed. The challenge to counsel's fees was also rejected because there was no basis to depart from the earlier view on that issue. The reconsideration application was dismissed with costs against the applicant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292810