TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court should interfere under Article 227 with an order of the Court of Authority under the Payment of Wages Act on the ground that the authority may have erred in law.
Analysis: The supervisory power under Article 227 is not an appellate power and is to be exercised sparingly to keep subordinate courts and tribunals within the bounds of their authority and in a legal manner. Even if the authority below had treated wages in lieu of leave as payable and that view was erroneous in law, such an error would not by itself justify interference under Article 227. The record disclosed no jurisdictional excess or injustice warranting correction in superintendence.
Conclusion: No interference under Article 227 was called for, and the petition was liable to fail.
TaxTMI 
