https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an order under the Payment of Wages Act, affirming that an employee is entitled to a month's pay in lieu of leave not taken due to summary termination. The Court emphasized its limited power under Article 227 to interfere with lower court decisions, stating it should only intervene if the lower court clearly exceeds its authority. As there was no clear error or injustice in the lower court's decision, the petition was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondents. Justices Gopendra Nath Das and Banerjee concurred with the Chief Justice's decision. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2020 16:01:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an order under the Payment of Wages Act, affirming that an employee is entitled to a month's pay in lieu of leave not taken due to summary termination. The Court emphasized its limited power under Article 227 to interfere with lower court decisions, stating it should only intervene if the lower court clearly exceeds its authority. As there was no clear error or injustice in the lower court's decision, the petition was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the respondents. Justices Gopendra Nath Das and Banerjee concurred with the Chief Justice's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910