<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (8) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910</link>
    <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is not appellate in nature and is to be used sparingly to keep subordinate authorities within jurisdiction and acting legally. An alleged legal error by the authority under the Payment of Wages Act, including treatment of wages in lieu of leave as payable, does not by itself justify interference in superintendence. Absent jurisdictional excess, perversity, or injustice, the High Court will not correct the order under Article 227.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 16:01:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (8) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910</link>
      <description>Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is not appellate in nature and is to be used sparingly to keep subordinate authorities within jurisdiction and acting legally. An alleged legal error by the authority under the Payment of Wages Act, including treatment of wages in lieu of leave as payable, does not by itself justify interference in superintendence. Absent jurisdictional excess, perversity, or injustice, the High Court will not correct the order under Article 227.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>