Revenue's Appeal Delay Rejected by CESTAT: Change of Opinion Not Grounds for Condonation The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue's application to condone a delay of 226 days in filing an appeal, as the respondents argued ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue's Appeal Delay Rejected by CESTAT: Change of Opinion Not Grounds for Condonation
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue's application to condone a delay of 226 days in filing an appeal, as the respondents argued the delay was actually 241 days. The Tribunal found no merit in the application, stating that a change of opinion is not grounds for condoning the delay.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue's application to condone a delay of 226 days in filing an appeal, as the respondents argued the delay was actually 241 days. The Tribunal found no merit in the application, stating that a change of opinion is not grounds for condoning the delay.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.