Supreme Court India 2017 Case Order: Counsel Representing Appellant and Respondent Parties The Supreme Court of India, in 2017, issued an order in the case. The judges, A.K. Sikri and R.K. Agrawal, JJ., presided over the matter. The appellant(s) ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court India 2017 Case Order: Counsel Representing Appellant and Respondent Parties
The Supreme Court of India, in 2017, issued an order in the case. The judges, A.K. Sikri and R.K. Agrawal, JJ., presided over the matter. The appellant(s) were represented by Mr. J.P. Cama, Mr. Gopal Singh, Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Ms. Varsha Poddar, and Mr. Mayan Prasad. On the other side, the respondent(s) were represented by Mr. M. P. Devanath, Mr. Anandh K., Mr. Abhishek Anand, and others.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 2017 (2) TMI 1448 - Order. "Leave granted." Parties' counsel were "heard." The Court held that "no ground is made out to interfere in these matters." On that basis the Court disposed of the proceedings and "The appeals are dismissed." The order is a concise appellate disposition applying the standard of interference review; no detailed reasons beyond the finding that grounds for interference are lacking were recorded.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
