Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the grant of bail to a person charged under sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, without considering the requirements of Section 37 of the Act, was sustainable.
Analysis: The order of bail rested only on the length of custody and contained no consideration of the statutory requirements under Section 37. In proceedings under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, compliance with Section 37 is mandatory, and a bail order made in disregard of that provision cannot stand. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The bail order was set aside and the respondent was directed to be taken back into custody.