Mandatory twin bail conditions under the Companies Act justified refusal of bail in a serious economic offence.

Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 imposes mandatory twin conditions for bail in economic offences: the Court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Section 212(7) makes these restrictions additional to the ordinary bail framework under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On the alleged large-scale fabrication of documents, account manipulation and diversion of funds, the HC found that this satisfaction could not be recorded and that the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner's attributed role also justified refusal of bail under Section 439 CrPC. Bail was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in view of the restrictions under Section 212(6) and Section 212(7) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Analysis: The allegations disclosed a large-scale economic offence involving fabrication of documents, manipulation of accounts and diversion of funds. The Court held that Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 contains mandatory twin conditions for bail, namely that the Court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the is not guilty and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Section 212(7) makes these restrictions additional to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On the material before it, the Court found that such satisfaction could not be reached. It further held that even independently under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the seriousness and magnitude of the economic offence and the active role attributed to the petitioner justified denial of bail.

Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to bail; the application was rejected.

Final Conclusion: Bail was refused because the statutory bail conditions were not met and the nature of the alleged economic offences warranted continued custody.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a special statute prescribes mandatory twin conditions for bail in economic offences, release cannot be ordered unless the Court is affirmatively satisfied on both innocence on a prima facie basis and the absence of likelihood of reoffending, in addition to the ordinary bail considerations under the criminal procedure law.

---