Landmark ruling: M/s Admac Formulations prevails over Commissioner of Income Tax. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of M/s Admac Formulations in the case against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (2018 (9) TMI ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Landmark ruling: M/s Admac Formulations prevails over Commissioner of Income Tax.
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of M/s Admac Formulations in the case against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (2018 (9) TMI 1808). Judges Ajay Kumar Mittal and Avneesh Jhingan presided over the case. Mr. Divya Suri and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj represented the appellant, while Mr. Yogesh Putney acted as Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. The case was identified as ITA No. 332 of 2015.
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana heard the case between M/s Admac Formulations and the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula. The citation for the judgment is 2018 (9) TMI 1808. Ajay Kumar Mittal and Avneesh Jhingan were the judges presiding over the case. Mr. Divya Suri and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj represented the appellant, while Mr. Yogesh Putney was the Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. The case was identified as ITA No. 332 of 2015.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
