<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1808 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279222</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of M/s Admac Formulations in the case against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (2018 (9) TMI 1808). Judges Ajay Kumar Mittal and Avneesh Jhingan presided over the case. Mr. Divya Suri and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj represented the appellant, while Mr. Yogesh Putney acted as Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. The case was identified as ITA No. 332 of 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1808 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279222</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of M/s Admac Formulations in the case against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula (2018 (9) TMI 1808). Judges Ajay Kumar Mittal and Avneesh Jhingan presided over the case. Mr. Divya Suri and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj represented the appellant, while Mr. Yogesh Putney acted as Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. The case was identified as ITA No. 332 of 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>