Transfer Pricing Dispute Resolved: Tribunal Decision on Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2007-08

The case involved transfer pricing adjustments for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08, as well as the disallowance of depreciation on fixed assets due to capital subsidy for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision to delete the adjustments made by the TPO for the assessment year 2005-06, finding the TNMM method applied by the assessee more appropriate. For the assessment year 2007-08, the Tribunal modified the CIT (A)'s decision on the corporate guarantee fee and directed a re-computation, while restoring the issue of interest on loans for fresh consideration. The final result was the dismissal of ITA No. 575/Del/2014 and partial allowance of ITA No. 3495/Del/2014.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for the Assessment Year 2005-06.
2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for the Assessment Year 2007-08.
3. Disallowance of Depreciation on Fixed Assets due to Capital Subsidy for the Assessment Year 2007-08.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for the Assessment Year 2005-06:
- Facts: The assessee, a pharmaceutical company, engaged in international transactions with its subsidiaries Dabur Oncology PLC and Dabur Nepal Private Limited. The assessee used the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) to justify the arm's length price (ALP) of these transactions.
- TPO's Observations:
- Lipholiser Machine: The TPO noted that the machine was purchased at a higher value than what Dabur Oncology PLC paid. The TPO computed depreciation and determined the value at Rs. 85,10,592/- against Rs. 2,13,50,000/- claimed by the assessee, resulting in an upward adjustment.
- Paclitaxel Drug: The TPO used export rates from a database to determine that the FOB value per unit of the drug was less than that of unrelated parties, leading to an adjustment of Rs. 98,79,900/-.
- Disodium Pamidronate: The TPO similarly adjusted the ALP based on external data, resulting in an upward adjustment of Rs. 67,35,902/-.
- MCS Extract: The TPO determined the landed cost at Rs. 6048 per kg, making an adjustment of Rs. 1,03,43,105/-.
- CIT (A)'s Decision: The CIT (A) deleted all the adjustments made by the TPO, finding the TNMM method applied by the assessee more appropriate and noting the lack of comparability in the TPO's CUP method.
- Tribunal's Conclusion:
- Lipholiser Machine: The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting that the machine was new and unused, with no defects in the documents provided.
- Paclitaxel and Disodium Pamidronate: The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (A) that the TPO failed to demonstrate comparability and that the TNMM method was more appropriate.
- MCS Extract: The Tribunal supported the CIT (A)'s reliance on the cost certificate provided by the assessee and found the TPO's adjustment unjustified.

2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for the Assessment Year 2007-08:
- Facts: The assessee provided a corporate guarantee to ABN AMRO Bank for foreign AEs and gave loans to foreign AEs.
- TPO's Observations:
- Corporate Guarantee: The TPO proposed an adjustment of Rs. 3,63,83,575/- by adopting an interest rate of 4.75%.
- Loan to Foreign AEs: The TPO proposed an addition of Rs. 5,62,08,167/- by adopting an interest rate of 14%.
- CIT (A)'s Decision: The CIT (A) restricted the adjustment to Rs. 66,76,850/- and deleted the disallowance of Rs. 20,92,221/- on depreciation.
- Tribunal's Conclusion:
- Corporate Guarantee: The Tribunal modified the CIT (A)'s decision, directing the AO to re-compute the ALP for corporate guarantee fee at 1%.
- Interest on Loan: The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT (A) for fresh consideration, taking into account the directions of the DRP for the previous year.
- Depreciation on Fixed Assets: The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, agreeing that the subsidy was capital in nature and should not be reduced from the cost of fixed assets.

Final Result:
- ITA No. 575/Del/2014: Dismissed.
- ITA No. 3495/Del/2014: Partly allowed.

---