TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellant's Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment</h1> <h3>Jaladi Srinivasa Rao Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs Visakhapatnam-II</h3> The appeal and stay application filed by the appellant were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad due to the appellant's failure to deposit ... Delay was condoned at a cost of ₹ 5000/-, which was to be deposited before 29/09/2016 - non-deposit of the amount i.e., ₹ 5000/- till date - Held that:- It is evident that the appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal - It may be mentioned that as per the maxim VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT, law helps those who are vigilant and not those who go to sleep. Appeal along with stay application filed by the appellant is dismissed for default. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed the appeal and stay application filed by the appellant for default as they did not deposit the required amount of Rs. 5000 within the specified time despite a delay being condoned earlier.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
