Appeal allowed despite 266-day delay due to financial hardship The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal to proceed despite a delay of 266 days in filing, citing severe financial hardship faced by the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal allowed despite 266-day delay due to financial hardship
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal to proceed despite a delay of 266 days in filing, citing severe financial hardship faced by the appellant who had to pledge jewelry to raise the pre-deposit amount required by the Central Excise Act, 1944.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai condoned a delay of 266 days in filing an appeal due to severe financial hardship faced by the appellant. The delay was explained by the applicant, who had to pledge jewelry with the bank to raise the pre-deposit amount as required by the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found the reason acceptable and allowed the appeal to proceed for disposal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.